Dworkin's argument is premised on individuals having equal wealth, opportunity, and information. Since this is not feasible, his conception of egalitarianism is not practical.

Question

Answer

Con: His argument is in line with the central principle of egalitarianism, in which individuals are treated as equals. Thus, directing resources to achieve equality in this manner is preferable.

Demo Classroom Debate: Medical Ethics

Dworkin's argument is premised on individuals having equal wealth, opportunity, and information. Since this is not feasible, his conception of egalitarianism is not practical.

Pros

Cons

His argument is in line with the central principle of egalitarianism, in which individuals are treated as equals. Thus, directing resources to achieve equality in this manner is preferable.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Dworkin's argument is premised on individuals having equal wealth, opportunity, and information. Since this is not feasible, his conception of egalitarianism is not practical.

Con claim 1

His argument is in line with the central principle of egalitarianism, in which individuals are treated as equals. Thus, directing resources to achieve equality in this manner is preferable.