“This House Believes That Current Global Actions Against Climate Change Are Sufficient”

Question

Answer

Pro: There are many programs, like the Green Climate Fund, that help developing countries become more aware of their carbon footprint and adopt sustainable practices. These programs provide financial and technological support to assist these nations in shifting to greener economies.

Answer

Pro: The Paris Agreement aims to strengthen global socioeconomic resilience against the danger of climate change in the post-2020 period. It is to keep the global temperature increase below 2°C as much as possible compared to the pre-industrialization period. It requires gradually reducing the use of fossil fuels and turning to renewable energy. The most important feature of the Agreement is that, unlike the Kyoto Protocol, developed and developing countries participate in mitigation action with NDC.

Answer

Pro: The Paris Agreement, a major international pact signed by 195 countries, aims to limit global warming below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C. To achieve this, many countries are enacting stricter environmental policies like carbon pricing and clean energy initiatives. These policies are accelerating the switch to clean energy, reducing emissions, and protecting vulnerable groups from climate change.

Answer

Pro: Current global actions have achieved visible results in combating climate change. Increasing investments in renewable energy reduce reliance on fossil fuels, thus lowering greenhouse gas emissions and preserving the environment. Additionally, the international community coming together to create a shared vision encourages a coordinated approach to combating climate change. Therefore, current actions provide an effective response to the climate crisis

Answer

Pro: UNFCCC, which came into force in 1992 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change in order to prevent the dangerous human-caused effects of climate change, has provided a basic framework for international cooperation on climate change. Thanks to the collaborations on this issue, it has been ensured that countries act together on climate health and thus have positive effects on the climate.

Answer

Pro: The Kyoto Protocol, signed in 1997, introduced the emission trading mechanism, enabling countries to achieve their emission reduction targets in a flexible and cost-effective way. This mechanism has supported the development of carbon markets. It is an agreement that requires developed countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2% compared to 1990. It has made great contributions to environmental health.

Answer

Con: Climate change leads to extreme weather events, damaging infrastructure and disrupting communities. Rising sea levels threaten coastal areas with erosion and flooding, displacing populations. Ecosystems suffer as habitats alter, causing species extinction. Economically, it impacts agriculture, reduces productivity, and raises costs for disaster response and repairs, threatening food security and causing financial losses.

Answer

Con: Despite climate crisis being an topic, countries and unions are still overlooking it. The temperatures are increasing, the sea level is rising and still not a single drastic messure has been taken. Countries are overlooking this issue for the sake of the economy and for making the wealthiest of people happy.

Answer

Con: Unfortunately the measures that are currently being taken are not sufficient enough to impact the growing problems of climate change. It is suggested for car owners to switch to electric cars in order to lower the carbon emissions within cities. While there aren't emissions being produced by the actual cars, there are a lot of factories that are emitting fumes in order to power such cars. In conclusion such effort is not adequate enough to make a change and more drastic measures are needed.

Answer

Con: The measures for climate change are not sufficient because the temperatures on the planet are falling too much the measures that have been taken because some countries do not apply the Kyoto treaty especially large countries like USA and China

Answer

Con: Governments have the power to enforce environmental regulations, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable practices. However, many states have been slow to take the necessary actions to mitigate climate change. This inaction can be attributed to several factors, including the influence of powerful fossil fuel industries, economic interests, and political considerations.

Answer

Con: The economic system and ongoing geopolitical conflicts significantly hinder the efficiency of actions against climate change. An example of this fact is the ongoing wars of Russia with Ukraine and Israel with Palestine.Many modern weapons contain chemicals and materials that can be highly destructive to the environment. These substances can contaminate soil and water sources, leading to reduced agricultural productivity and long-lasting damage to ecosystems.

Answer

Con: Despite international agreements like the Paris Agreement, current global emissons are not decreasing at the necessary rate to meet the targets set for limiting global warming to 1.5ºC or even 2ºC. Many countries aren't on track to meet their pledged reductions, and some have even increased their emissions.

Answer

Con: Currently, global efforts to combat climate change are insufficient. The emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement do not limit warming to 1.5°C, and many countries are not meeting their own targets. The transition to renewable energy is still inadequate, with fossil fuel use predominating. Additionally, adaptation and mitigation policies vary in effectiveness, especially in developing countries. Therefore, the global response does not match the challenge of climate change.

Answer

Con: Unfortunately, their enough is not nearly enough to achieve what is necessary: saving the planet from climate change. People may be thinking that the knowledge provided in school on the matter is sufficient, but it's is lacking. We all know that children can only sufficiently absorve knowledge when it's given to them, by doing something fun, something interactive. We need to leave behind the old-fashioned ways of learning when it comes to climate change and embrace new and engaging methods.

Answer

Con: Despite what was agreed with the Kyoto Protocol, the governments do not seem to motivate and inform the citizens effectively. For example, worldwide there are many companies that use agricultural waste, something that many citizens do not know. These companies help to reduce CO2 and consequently stabilize the global temperature rise to levels below 2 degrees Celsius.

Answer

Con: We really cannot be claiming that the actions against climate change are enough until all the residents in rural areas have the option to be eco-friendly by using public transportation. It's really unthinkable in this day and age to not provide even a small bus for the people, just because they are in the countryside. Especially the ones with crops, would much prefer to emit less and help the environment recover.

Answer

Con: In greenhouses, the amount of CO2 is scaled up. By pumping extra CO2 in from gas plantsreddit.com or coal plants. That CO2 is not all taken up by the plants of course, and leaks through the cracks of the greenhouse. It looks very artificially. Also when talking about climate change we call CO2 a "greenhouse gas" because of the blanketing effect it has out in the upper atmosphere. Regular people could get confused and associate it with the literal greenhouses (as the source problem).

Answer

Pro: The progress that environmental policies have achieved so far, highlighting the implementation of stricter regulations, investments in renewable energies and changes in individual behavior are more than enough, as by maintaining the application of these measures, the most severe impacts of climate change can be mitigated.

Answer

Con: The inadequacy of actions taken to address climate change is alarming and requires urgent attention on a global scale. Despite increasing awareness of the severity of the climate crisis, the measures implemented thus far have fallen short of what is needed to mitigate its devastating impacts. From insufficient emission reduction targets to slow progress in transitioning to renewable energy sources, the current pace of action is simply insufficient to safeguard our planet and future generations.

Answer

Con: Global actions against climate change, though praised, fall short due to several reasons: lack of urgency to meet targets, hindered implementation by political and social barriers, disproportionate burden on marginalized communities, neglect of adaptation measures, and inadequate international cooperation. In summary, while steps have been taken, they're insufficient to address the urgent challenges of climate change.

Answer

Con: Social and economic inequalities:The impacts of climate change and the measures taken to combat it are not evenly distributed around the world. Marginalised communities are often the most affected by the impacts of climate change and at the same time have limited access to resources to cope with these changes.

Answer

Con: Inadequate reduction rate: Actions taken so far to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are not sufficient to stop climate change in a meaningful timeframe. Many countries have still not reached the targets set in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement.

Answer

Con: Global warming can lead to the desertification of lands, they heat up, thus the normal cycle of marine life is disturbed, the melting of glaciers which leads to a high water level which leads to floods, acid rain and intense allergies on people!

Answer

Con: These measures against climate change, in the agricultural sector, are insufficient. Intensive agriculture, the main driver of World Food production, continues to generate significant greenhouse gas emissions and cause massive deforestation. A thorough review of agricultural principles and practices is needed to promote a sustainable approach focusing on regenerative agriculture, thereby reducing negative environmental impacts and adapting to climate change in a more efficient and equitable way.

Answer

Con: Global warming is very harmful. An example would be the risk of extinction of species that increases with each degree of warming.

Answer

Con: Global warming is very harmful to the planet, because it leads to the destruction of many ecosystems, to the occurrence of very long droughts and to the reduction of water levels in nature.

Answer

Con: We no longer have time for slow, sustained actions. You must take urgent action, otherwise the future of humanity is in doubt. The proposed goal - a decrease of only 1.5 degrees of global temperature by 2050 - has already been achieved, and a warming of 3 degrees would lead to the disappearance of some large cities, such as Rio de Janeiro, from the face of the Earth.

Answer

Con: Fossil fuel dependence: Most global economies still rely on fossil fuels for energy, and the transition to renewable energy sources is slow and insufficient to counteract carbon emissions.

Answer

Con: Even with international initiatives and treaties like the Paris Agreement, the impact on the aquatic environment remains significant. Climate change is profoundly affecting the aquatic environment, encompassing oceans, seas, rivers, and lakes. Increasing global temperatures result in melting glaciers and rising sea levels, disrupting the habitat of certain marine species and driving species to migrate or face extinction.

Answer

Pro: try

Answer

Con: Current global actions against climate change are proving insufficient in the face of rapidly increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The steps taken by countries to reach the targets set in the Paris Agreement are unable to halt the overall rise in emissions. This highlights the urgent need for more effective and comprehensive actions.

Answer

Con: Current actions against climate change are insufficient if we consider everyday examples. In particular, in many large cities we find insufficient means of public transport. This results in disgruntled citizens choosing to use their cars more and more often, prolonging air pollution. After all, it is a fact that during the quarantine, lead pollution had decreased significantly.

Answer

Con: All of these attempts to stop global warming have not had the desired effects, resulting in rising sea levels that will in the future flood coastal areas and Islands, affecting millions of people; climate change that has amplified extreme weather events such as hurricanes and droughts, threatening food safety and infrastructure, even rising temperatures that have led to the extinction of some species of plants and animals, disrupting ecological balance and reducing biodiversity.

Answer

Con: Current global actions against climate change are insufficient. International cooperation is lacking and often hindered by geopolitical tensions and economic interests. Additionally, while there is growing public awareness about climate change, there is still insufficient understanding and engagement regarding the urgency and severity of the crisis.

Answer

Con: Although, the primary cause of global warming is a result of the external use and burning of the oil"s substitutes, the problem remains, regarding the primary solution taken which is the use of electric vehicles. Specifically, the production of electric vehicles, as well as, the extraction of minerals needed for baterries require a huge amount of oil to be consumed. As a consequence the equilibrium between the usage of oil and reduction of usage of oil by the usage of batteries, is in fact zero.

Answer

Pro: There are plenty of examples that show that our efforts are working. As an example by liwering the consume of ozone depleting substances the ozone layer has been recovered . Thanks to the strict environmental policies most countries have there has been a significant drops in air pollution and green house gas emmision

Answer

Pro: Energy efficiency is making a substantial contribution to the fight against climate change by reducing our energy consumption by 25% and lowering emissions by 20%. By employing greater energy efficiency in buildings, appliances, and transportation systems, we can save $250 billion annually. Energy efficiency investments not only benefit the environment but also the economy by creating new job opportunities, revitalizing economies, and enhancing energy security.

Answer

Pro: Current global actions have raised significant awareness in the fight against climate change. People are making more efforts at both individual and societal levels to reduce environmental impacts. Furthermore, the development of policies and practices in environmental sustainability is a significant step towards achieving sustainable development goals. These actions demonstrate our commitment to leaving a more livable world for future generations and are therefore sufficient.

Answer

Pro: The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, is a comprehensive agreement that commits to the goal of keeping global warming below 2°C and striving not to exceed 1.5°C. This agreement demonstrates the commitment of more than 190 countries to work together to combat climate change. If we look at the IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) data, we will see the usefulness of this regulation.

Answer

Pro: (Abbass, K., Qasim, M., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science And Pollution Research International, 29(28), 42539-42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6)

Answer

Pro: Throughout history, the climate of the planet has shown a cyclicity, with cooling periods (glaciations) followed by periods in which the climate warmed. All these temperature variations led to the planet we have today (the different species of plants and animals, some species disappearing, new ones appeared, some of them adapted to the new conditions). I believe that the new climatic conditions can lead to an evolution of the human species, of the animal and vegetable kingdoms.

Answer

Pro: Thanks to the activist there has been a huge increase in how much people know about climate change Educational programs, news coverage, and grassroots movements have made more people aware of the importance of reducing their carbon footprint. This behaviour is leading to a significant reduction of ones carbon footprint

Answer

Pro: Renewable energy is making a significant impact on climate change. Solar and wind power are reducing reliance on fossil fuels by 30% and greenhouse gas emissions by 25%. With falling costs and advancements, renewable energy is becoming a more attractive option.

Answer

Pro: Current global actions have made progress in combating climate change. International agreements, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and investments in renewable energy are significant steps. Awareness campaigns and environmental sustainability practices also encourage individuals and companies to act more responsibly. These actions form an important foundation for reducing the impacts of global warming and leaving a more sustainable world for future generations.

Answer

Pro: The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, is a comprehensive agreement that commits to the goal of keeping global warming below 2°C and striving not to exceed 1.5°C. This agreement demonstrates the commitment of more than 190 countries to work together to combat climate change. If we look at the IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) data, we will see the usefulness of this regulation.

Answer

Con: Technological advancements alone aren't enough to combat climate change effectively. While renewable energy is growing, it's still not replacing fossil fuels quickly enough. Additionally, many industries, such as agriculture and transportation, continue to emit high levels of greenhouse gases. Without a broader systemic change and policy-driven shifts in consumption and production patterns, current efforts won't be sufficient to meet climate goals

Answer

Con: Agreements like the Paris Accord are important, but current actions fall short. The IPCC shows we're not on track to limit warming to 1.5°C. Many countries are missing targets, deforestation continues, and fossil fuel use remains high. Stronger, faster action is needed to avoid severe climate impacts.

Answer

Pro: Current efforts to combat climate change are adequate. Nations are implementing renewable energy and reducing emissions and international agreements set achievable goals, while technological advancements make green solutions more viable. These combined actions are effectively addressing the climate crisis without drastic measures that could potentially cause more harm than good.

Answer

Con: It is true that there are a lot of programs working on sustainability, but most of them are not accomplishing their objectives, a perfect example is the Paris treat. While sustainability is seen as "too expensive", there are studies that show that if we continue not being sustainable, in the future, the price of climate change will be much higher than nowadays change to sustainability. It is not a matter of "enough actions", it is a matter of lack of time, we are running out of time.

Answer

Con: Despite some efforts to combat climate change, progress has been insufficient given the escalating severity of the issue. Political inertia, economic interests in fossil fuels, inconsistent policies across different administrations and the complexity of transitioning to renewable energy sources all contribute to the slow pace of change. Without more decisive and coordinated action, we risk irreparable damage to ecosystems and communities worldwide.

Answer

Con: Despite the increasing efforts of many countries to fight climate change, some of the world's largest CO2 emitters, such as China and India, are not sufficiently prioritizing such measures. This unproductive approach might be attributed to various factors including economic growth imperatives and heavy reliance on coal for energy. Without the active participation and commitment of all nations, especially those with significant emissions, the effectiveness of global efforts will remain limited.

Answer

Pro: Over the last two decades, the global public opinion has pressured governments to address climate change related issues, resulting in more responsible governments and a growing number of people who choose a sustainable lifestyle. Widespread activism and increased awareness have driven significant action, from emissions reductions to renewable energy adoption. This action and influence has led to meaningful progress, suggesting that the world is finally on the right path to tackle climate change.

Answer

Pro: It's undeniable that the world is making significant progress on environmental issues: countries are enacting stringent laws and joining international agreements to cut emissions. For example, agenda 2030 addresses climate change through its Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 13, which calls for urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. Technological advances in renewable energy and electric vehicles are more and more reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Answer

Con: The European Climate Pact article provides actionable tips for enhancing climate action through community activities. It highlights successful initiatives like climate walks, local action groups, and debates, offering practical advice from Climate Pact Ambassadors. These activities aim to foster greater community involvement and collective effort in tackling climate change.climate-pact.europa.eu

Answer

Pro: This article highlights various successful initiatives and breakthroughs in the fight against climate change. For instance, Portugal achieved a significant milestone by generating 95% of its electricity from renewable sources in April 2024, demonstrating its leadership in renewable energy within Europe.

Answer

Pro: Current global actions against climate change are sufficient as they reflect a realistic balance between economic development and environmental protection. Initiatives such as the Paris Agreement have garnered international commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with many countries actively investing in renewable energy and implementing policies to decrease carbon footprints.

Answer

Pro: "Transition to renewable energy stands out as one of the most critical strategic goals" This is one of the first steps to leaving a more livable world to humanity.

Answer

Pro: The Montreal Protocol was created so that the mitigation plan could be revised based on periodic scientific and technological evaluations. Following these technical and scientific evaluations, it was carried out in 1990 (London), 1992 (Copenhagen), 1995 (Vienna), 1997 (Montreal), 1999 (Beijing) and 1999 (Beijing) in order to accelerate the shortening of the calendar. of the Protocol in question. Again in 2007 (Montreal).

Answer

Pro: The effects of climate change are not limited to individual species but spread across entire ecosystems. It is difficult to predict exactly what the effects of global warming will be in the future and whether it will lead to a mass extinction. However, it is clear that the continued warming of the Earth's surface and its effects on ecosystems and species will have important consequences for the planet and its inhabitants.

Answer

Pro: Climate change could have some benefits: milder winters may reduce heating costs, longer growing seasons might boost agriculture in colder regions, and new areas like Siberia could become habitable. However, these are minor compared to the extensive negative impacts.

Answer

Con: Current global actions against climate change are widely regarded as insufficient to address the magnitude of the crisis. Many countries are not meeting their emission reduction targets. The reliance on fossil fuels remains high, and renewable energy adoption is slow. Financial and technological support for developing nations is lacking, hindering their ability to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts.

Answer

Con: I don't agree with this statement because I think we should do much more to protect the climate

Answer

Con: I don't agree because the effects of human activities are irreversible. The climate change had became more frequent and more severe. Many types of extreme weather including heatwaves and hurricanes becoming more harmful. Its is still possible to limit the warm but we're not there yet.

Answer

Con: The current global actions against climate change are insufficient as we are witnessing that no evolutions are being made and people still is very irresponsible because they are only looking to themselfs and it's needed to educate them

Answer

Con: I believe that the the current global actions against climate change are not sufficient as we can all see the many effects that are constantly hann

Answer

Con: I desagree, as believe that current global actions against climate change are insuffucient, and we need to adopt more rigorous and ambitious measures to mitigate its impacts.

Answer

Con: Furthermore, changes in weather patterns and rising sea levels can endanger agriculture, food security, and wildlife populations. Overall, the impacts of climate change are far-reaching and urgent action is needed to mitigate its effects.

Answer

Con: Climate change poses numerous cons to our planet and its inhabitants. One major consequence is the rise in global temperatures, leading to more frequent and severe heatwaves. This can result in health issues, such as heat-related illnesses and even fatalities, particularly among vulnerable populations. Additionally, climate change leads to more intense natural disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, and floods, which can devastate communities and ecosystems.

Answer

Con: Around the world, governments and automakers are promoting electric vehicles as a key technology to curb oil use and fight climate change.GM has said it aims to stop selling new gasoline-powered cars and light trucks by 2035 and will pivot to battery-powered models.Volvo said it would move even faster and introduce an all-electric lineup by 2030. But as electric cars and trucks go mainstream, they have faced a persistent question: Are they really as green as advertised? .nytimes.com nytimes.com

Answer

Pro: Global market analysts predict an $86 billion carbon capture technology market by 2030, incentivizing businesses to adopt emission-reduction strategies and potentially leading to a significant decrease in greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.

Answer

Pro: Transnational city alliances, like C40 Cities, are bypassing potential national roadblocks on climate action by fostering collaboration on greenhouse gas mitigation efforts, such as green building initiatives and public transportation electrification.

Answer

Pro: Accelerated research on hydrogen fuel cell technology offers a promising pathway towards clean and efficient energy, potentially displacing fossil fuels.

Answer

Pro: As explained in the article: “A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures”. More and more investment is being made in renewable energies, which are non-polluting and use fewer resources such as oil. Politically, many countries are pushing for measures to encourage these changes and some sectors such as agriculture are benefiting.

Answer

Pro: Moreover, initiatives like the Climate Investment Funds, supported by multiple donor countries, signify a collective commitment to mobilizing resources for climate action in developing nations. These examples highlight the growing solidarity and shared responsibility in the fight against climate change.

Answer

Pro: The recent Glasgow Climate Pact, signed by nearly 200 countries, underscores the unprecedented level of global cooperation and commitment to addressing climate change. Countries have pledged to enhance their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and ramp up efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

Answer

Pro: The collective efforts of governments, businesses, and civil society around the world demonstrate a growing recognition of the urgency of the climate crisis and a willingness to take action. They might point to initiatives such as the establishment of carbon pricing mechanisms, the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, and the mobilization of climate finance as examples of the international community’s commitment to tackling climate change.

Answer

Pro: (Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18(6), 2069-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w)

Answer

Pro: The article: “Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review”. points out that biogenic-based sequestration techniques are to some extent mature and can be implemented immediately. Moreover, they are evolving and maturing in carbon markets until they are phased out. It also points out that most of the related technologies can be implemented immediately, so there is a great deal of evolution in this area.

Answer

Pro: In regions prone to extreme weather events, such as coastal areas susceptible to hurricanes, current global actions have helped communities better prepare and respond to climate-related disasters. E.g. Bangladesh, where early warning systems and resilient infrastructure have significantly reduced the loss of life and property damage during cyclones. This demonstrates that while climate change remains a threat, our proactive measures are making a difference in safeguarding vulnerable populations.

Answer

Pro: While climate change remains a pressing issue, current global actions have been effective in mitigating some of its worst effects. They could highlight initiatives aimed at adaptation and resilience-building in vulnerable communities, as well as investments in climate-related research and technology development, as evidence that current efforts are making a positive impact in addressing the challenges posed by climate change.

Answer

Pro: Rosenstock, T. S., Lamanna, C., Chesterman, S., Hammond, J., Kadiyala, S., Luedeling, E., Shepherd, K. D., DeRenzi, B., & Van Wijk, M. T. (2017). When less is more: innovations for tracking progress toward global targets. Current Opinion In Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.010

Answer

Pro: Progress is currently being made in this area and will be further enhanced when sustainability models are created. Therefore, we can say that there has been progress and that there has clearly been a great evolution in these years. Also, the upside is that the political will, funding and innovations are becoming available.

Answer

Pro: “Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, global efforts to combat climate change have shown significant progress. For instance, according to the latest report by the IPCC, emissions have started to plateau in some regions, indicating that our collective actions are having an impact. Additionally, countries like Sweden have exceeded their renewable energy targets ahead of schedule, demonstrating that current initiatives are effective in transitioning towards cleaner energy sources.”

Answer

Pro: Current global actions have led to significant progress towards achieving international climate targets, such as those set out in the Paris Agreement. They could point to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, increased adoption of renewable energy sources, and improved energy efficiency as evidence of the effectiveness of current efforts.

Climate Change and Global Actions

“This House Believes That Current Global Actions Against Climate Change Are Sufficient”

Pros

Cons

try

(Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18(6), 2069-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w)

Accelerated research on hydrogen fuel cell technology offers a promising pathway towards clean and efficient energy, potentially displacing fossil fuels.

Transnational city alliances, like C40 Cities, are bypassing potential national roadblocks on climate action by fostering collaboration on greenhouse gas mitigation efforts, such as green building initiatives and public transportation electrification.

Global market analysts predict an $86 billion carbon capture technology market by 2030, incentivizing businesses to adopt emission-reduction strategies and potentially leading to a significant decrease in greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.

Climate change could have some benefits: milder winters may reduce heating costs, longer growing seasons might boost agriculture in colder regions, and new areas like Siberia could become habitable. However, these are minor compared to the extensive negative impacts.

Renewable energy is making a significant impact on climate change. Solar and wind power are reducing reliance on fossil fuels by 30% and greenhouse gas emissions by 25%. With falling costs and advancements, renewable energy is becoming a more attractive option.

"Transition to renewable energy stands out as one of the most critical strategic goals" This is one of the first steps to leaving a more livable world to humanity.

There are many programs, like the Green Climate Fund, that help developing countries become more aware of their carbon footprint and adopt sustainable practices. These programs provide financial and technological support to assist these nations in shifting to greener economies.

Fossil fuel dependence: Most global economies still rely on fossil fuels for energy, and the transition to renewable energy sources is slow and insufficient to counteract carbon emissions.

Global warming is very harmful to the planet, because it leads to the destruction of many ecosystems, to the occurrence of very long droughts and to the reduction of water levels in nature.

Global warming is very harmful. An example would be the risk of extinction of species that increases with each degree of warming.

Global warming can lead to the desertification of lands, they heat up, thus the normal cycle of marine life is disturbed, the melting of glaciers which leads to a high water level which leads to floods, acid rain and intense allergies on people!

Inadequate reduction rate: Actions taken so far to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are not sufficient to stop climate change in a meaningful timeframe. Many countries have still not reached the targets set in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement.

Furthermore, changes in weather patterns and rising sea levels can endanger agriculture, food security, and wildlife populations. Overall, the impacts of climate change are far-reaching and urgent action is needed to mitigate its effects.

I desagree, as believe that current global actions against climate change are insuffucient, and we need to adopt more rigorous and ambitious measures to mitigate its impacts.

I believe that the the current global actions against climate change are not sufficient as we can all see the many effects that are constantly hann

The current global actions against climate change are insufficient as we are witnessing that no evolutions are being made and people still is very irresponsible because they are only looking to themselfs and it's needed to educate them

I don't agree because the effects of human activities are irreversible. The climate change had became more frequent and more severe. Many types of extreme weather including heatwaves and hurricanes becoming more harmful. Its is still possible to limit the warm but we're not there yet.

I don't agree with this statement because I think we should do much more to protect the climate

The measures for climate change are not sufficient because the temperatures on the planet are falling too much the measures that have been taken because some countries do not apply the Kyoto treaty especially large countries like USA and China

Selected thesis

“This House Believes That Current Global Actions Against Climate Change Are Sufficient”

Pro claim 1

try

Pro claim 2, children below

Pro claim 3, children below

Pro claim 4

Pro claim 5, children below

Pro claim 6

Pro claim 7

Pro claim 8

Pro claim 9, children below

Pro claim 10

Pro claim 11

(Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18(6), 2069-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w)

Pro claim 12, children below

Pro claim 13

Pro claim 14

Pro claim 15

Pro claim 16

Pro claim 17

Accelerated research on hydrogen fuel cell technology offers a promising pathway towards clean and efficient energy, potentially displacing fossil fuels.

Pro claim 18

Transnational city alliances, like C40 Cities, are bypassing potential national roadblocks on climate action by fostering collaboration on greenhouse gas mitigation efforts, such as green building initiatives and public transportation electrification.

Pro claim 19

Global market analysts predict an $86 billion carbon capture technology market by 2030, incentivizing businesses to adopt emission-reduction strategies and potentially leading to a significant decrease in greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.

Pro claim 20

Climate change could have some benefits: milder winters may reduce heating costs, longer growing seasons might boost agriculture in colder regions, and new areas like Siberia could become habitable. However, these are minor compared to the extensive negative impacts.

Pro claim 21

Pro claim 22

Pro claim 23, children below

Pro claim 24

Pro claim 25

Pro claim 26, children below

Pro claim 27

Pro claim 28

Renewable energy is making a significant impact on climate change. Solar and wind power are reducing reliance on fossil fuels by 30% and greenhouse gas emissions by 25%. With falling costs and advancements, renewable energy is becoming a more attractive option.

Pro claim 29, children below

Pro claim 30

Pro claim 31

Pro claim 32

Pro claim 33, children below

Pro claim 34

"Transition to renewable energy stands out as one of the most critical strategic goals" This is one of the first steps to leaving a more livable world to humanity.

Pro claim 35, children below

Pro claim 36

Pro claim 37

There are many programs, like the Green Climate Fund, that help developing countries become more aware of their carbon footprint and adopt sustainable practices. These programs provide financial and technological support to assist these nations in shifting to greener economies.

Pro claim 38

Pro claim 39

Pro claim 40

Pro claim 41

Pro claim 42

Con claim 1

Con claim 2, children below

Con claim 3

Con claim 4, children below

Fossil fuel dependence: Most global economies still rely on fossil fuels for energy, and the transition to renewable energy sources is slow and insufficient to counteract carbon emissions.

Con claim 5, children below

Con claim 6

Con claim 7, children below

Global warming is very harmful to the planet, because it leads to the destruction of many ecosystems, to the occurrence of very long droughts and to the reduction of water levels in nature.

Con claim 8, children below

Global warming is very harmful. An example would be the risk of extinction of species that increases with each degree of warming.

Con claim 9, children below

Con claim 10, children below

Global warming can lead to the desertification of lands, they heat up, thus the normal cycle of marine life is disturbed, the melting of glaciers which leads to a high water level which leads to floods, acid rain and intense allergies on people!

Con claim 11, children below

Inadequate reduction rate: Actions taken so far to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are not sufficient to stop climate change in a meaningful timeframe. Many countries have still not reached the targets set in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement.

Con claim 12, children below

Con claim 13, children below

Con claim 14, children below

Con claim 15

Con claim 16

Con claim 17

Con claim 18

Con claim 19

Furthermore, changes in weather patterns and rising sea levels can endanger agriculture, food security, and wildlife populations. Overall, the impacts of climate change are far-reaching and urgent action is needed to mitigate its effects.

Con claim 20

Con claim 21