Boycotting or avoiding goods with higher carbon footprints can diminish the demand for these goods, leading them to be produced less.

Question

Answer

Pro: Animal farming requires a large amount of energy and natural resources and contributes heavily to deforestation. Decreasing meat consumption could create significant change.

Answer

Con: It is often very difficult to adopt climate-friendly habits, especially for people who cannot afford expensive eco-friendly products.

Answer

Pro: The fumes from gasoline vehicles are known to pollute the environment, so people can choose to use public transport instead.

What is the best way to fight climate change?

Boycotting or avoiding goods with higher carbon footprints can diminish the demand for these goods, leading them to be produced less.

Pros

Cons

Animal farming requires a large amount of energy and natural resources and contributes heavily to deforestation. Decreasing meat consumption could create significant change.

The fumes from gasoline vehicles are known to pollute the environment, so people can choose to use public transport instead.

It is often very difficult to adopt climate-friendly habits, especially for people who cannot afford expensive eco-friendly products.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

Boycotting or avoiding goods with higher carbon footprints can diminish the demand for these goods, leading them to be produced less.

Pro claim 1

Animal farming requires a large amount of energy and natural resources and contributes heavily to deforestation. Decreasing meat consumption could create significant change.

Pro claim 2

The fumes from gasoline vehicles are known to pollute the environment, so people can choose to use public transport instead.

Con claim 1, children below

It is often very difficult to adopt climate-friendly habits, especially for people who cannot afford expensive eco-friendly products.