if the network is to have a neutral disposition then the choice must fall on the participants. limiting choice on the rules of association between participants and pushing delegation without recourse or options is not the neutral position.

Question

Answer

Con: You are talking about a neutral position for pool operators. Pool operators do not sustain the network, individuals do with their trust. Poool operators facilitate. Neutrality should be on the side of the individual.

Cardano Contingent Staking

if the network is to have a neutral disposition then the choice must fall on the participants. limiting choice on the rules of association between participants and pushing delegation without recourse or options is not the neutral position.

Pros

Cons

You are talking about a neutral position for pool operators. Pool operators do not sustain the network, individuals do with their trust. Poool operators facilitate. Neutrality should be on the side of the individual.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

if the network is to have a neutral disposition then the choice must fall on the participants. limiting choice on the rules of association between participants and pushing delegation without recourse or options is not the neutral position.

Con claim 1

You are talking about a neutral position for pool operators. Pool operators do not sustain the network, individuals do with their trust. Poool operators facilitate. Neutrality should be on the side of the individual.