Contingent Staking introduces additional censorship possibilities onto the Cardano blockchain.

Question

Answer

Con: Contingent Staking is not a prerequisite to censoring Transaction/Blocks, or black listing of address.

Answer

Con: Failure in stages is better than failure in total. Censorship of the block chain becomes a binary without mechanisms like contingent staking. This creates situations where the governments ban the miners or in our case spo, rather than a framework to limit censorship.

Cardano Contingent Staking

Contingent Staking introduces additional censorship possibilities onto the Cardano blockchain.

Pros

Cons

Contingent Staking is not a prerequisite to censoring Transaction/Blocks, or black listing of address.

Failure in stages is better than failure in total. Censorship of the block chain becomes a binary without mechanisms like contingent staking. This creates situations where the governments ban the miners or in our case spo, rather than a framework to limit censorship.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Contingent Staking introduces additional censorship possibilities onto the Cardano blockchain.

Con claim 1

Contingent Staking is not a prerequisite to censoring Transaction/Blocks, or black listing of address.

Con claim 2

Failure in stages is better than failure in total. Censorship of the block chain becomes a binary without mechanisms like contingent staking. This creates situations where the governments ban the miners or in our case spo, rather than a framework to limit censorship.