Stake is not classified by the system. Individual spo's would make that decision. This is another statement which assumes that all pools will be contingent staking pools when the incentives are heavily on the reverse case.

Question

Answer

Con: Certain addresses may be banned from staking if majority of pools is CS. That stake will turn into 'bad stake' and won't have the same rights and value of the remaining stake. The stake will be classified by SPOs, not the protocol/system.

Answer

Con: How many SPOs will adhere to CS? How can you evaluate such number? What would happen if you miss your estimate and lets say, 98% of representated stake is CS?

Cardano Contingent Staking

Stake is not classified by the system. Individual spo's would make that decision. This is another statement which assumes that all pools will be contingent staking pools when the incentives are heavily on the reverse case.

Pros

Cons

How many SPOs will adhere to CS? How can you evaluate such number? What would happen if you miss your estimate and lets say, 98% of representated stake is CS?

Certain addresses may be banned from staking if majority of pools is CS. That stake will turn into 'bad stake' and won't have the same rights and value of the remaining stake. The stake will be classified by SPOs, not the protocol/system.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Stake is not classified by the system. Individual spo's would make that decision. This is another statement which assumes that all pools will be contingent staking pools when the incentives are heavily on the reverse case.

Con claim 1

How many SPOs will adhere to CS? How can you evaluate such number? What would happen if you miss your estimate and lets say, 98% of representated stake is CS?

Con claim 2

Certain addresses may be banned from staking if majority of pools is CS. That stake will turn into 'bad stake' and won't have the same rights and value of the remaining stake. The stake will be classified by SPOs, not the protocol/system.