As a delegator, I'm concerned that an SPO might kick me out of the pool without notice.

Question

Answer

Con: Agree that a failed contingency should notify the delegator; However, CS does (by definition) mean that delegation could fail, so I see this less as a concern than as a desirable feature of CS.

Answer

Pro: That's a fair point. Cardano still needs a protocol level notification system

Answer

Pro: That is not the feature being added, contingent staking only means the SPO has to agree to your delegation when you first delegate to that pool but doesn't give them the ability to remove delegators after they have agreed to the stake

Answer

Pro: Humanity is becoming more and more busy & overwhelmed with digital information and work........ Having to re-delegate is another thing to do... Many won't notice or do it. == loss for ada holder, stake pools and total delegation of network. ---- I love the SET & FORGET, we currently have.

Cardano Contingent Staking

As a delegator, I'm concerned that an SPO might kick me out of the pool without notice.

Pros

Cons

That's a fair point. Cardano still needs a protocol level notification system

Humanity is becoming more and more busy & overwhelmed with digital information and work........ Having to re-delegate is another thing to do... Many won't notice or do it. == loss for ada holder, stake pools and total delegation of network. ---- I love the SET & FORGET, we currently have.

That is not the feature being added, contingent staking only means the SPO has to agree to your delegation when you first delegate to that pool but doesn't give them the ability to remove delegators after they have agreed to the stake

Agree that a failed contingency should notify the delegator; However, CS does (by definition) mean that delegation could fail, so I see this less as a concern than as a desirable feature of CS.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

As a delegator, I'm concerned that an SPO might kick me out of the pool without notice.

Pro claim 1

That's a fair point. Cardano still needs a protocol level notification system

Pro claim 2

Humanity is becoming more and more busy & overwhelmed with digital information and work........ Having to re-delegate is another thing to do... Many won't notice or do it. == loss for ada holder, stake pools and total delegation of network. ---- I love the SET & FORGET, we currently have.

Pro claim 3

That is not the feature being added, contingent staking only means the SPO has to agree to your delegation when you first delegate to that pool but doesn't give them the ability to remove delegators after they have agreed to the stake

Con claim 1

Agree that a failed contingency should notify the delegator; However, CS does (by definition) mean that delegation could fail, so I see this less as a concern than as a desirable feature of CS.