We should vote on it, blame simple. Yet I struggle to see how that would be harmfull since it owuld be optionnal. There is no chances SPO would need to check people are not from lets say the USA as no one can prove they are not something only they are something.

Question

Answer

Con: Until the delegate has their address blacklisted for staking with a non-compliant pool. This is inevitable. L1 must remain agnostic AT ALL COSTS.

Cardano Contingent Staking

We should vote on it, blame simple. Yet I struggle to see how that would be harmfull since it owuld be optionnal. There is no chances SPO would need to check people are not from lets say the USA as no one can prove they are not something only they are something.

Pros

Cons

Until the delegate has their address blacklisted for staking with a non-compliant pool. This is inevitable. L1 must remain agnostic AT ALL COSTS.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

We should vote on it, blame simple. Yet I struggle to see how that would be harmfull since it owuld be optionnal. There is no chances SPO would need to check people are not from lets say the USA as no one can prove they are not something only they are something.

Con claim 1

Until the delegate has their address blacklisted for staking with a non-compliant pool. This is inevitable. L1 must remain agnostic AT ALL COSTS.