CS removes the ability of over saturation as a means of preventing malicious behavior or protest by community. This is a tool many small fish could use to exercise their voice.

Question

Answer

Pro: This point of oversaturation is interesting. Up until now, oversaturation was avoided by simply hoping nobody will delegate beyond saturation. However, with CS, SPO's can forcefully remove random (or perhaps not so random) delegators to ensure staying at saturation or below

Answer

Con: Maximizing a malevolent actor's influence and rewards is a protest now? Please protest me. DM for a stake pool ticker (I will set one up so you can).

Cardano Contingent Staking

CS removes the ability of over saturation as a means of preventing malicious behavior or protest by community. This is a tool many small fish could use to exercise their voice.

Pros

Cons

This point of oversaturation is interesting. Up until now, oversaturation was avoided by simply hoping nobody will delegate beyond saturation. However, with CS, SPO's can forcefully remove random (or perhaps not so random) delegators to ensure staying at saturation or below

Maximizing a malevolent actor's influence and rewards is a protest now? Please protest me. DM for a stake pool ticker (I will set one up so you can).

Selected claim, opposing its parent

CS removes the ability of over saturation as a means of preventing malicious behavior or protest by community. This is a tool many small fish could use to exercise their voice.

Pro claim 1

This point of oversaturation is interesting. Up until now, oversaturation was avoided by simply hoping nobody will delegate beyond saturation. However, with CS, SPO's can forcefully remove random (or perhaps not so random) delegators to ensure staying at saturation or below

Con claim 1

Maximizing a malevolent actor's influence and rewards is a protest now? Please protest me. DM for a stake pool ticker (I will set one up so you can).