Saving different species and their habitats should be more important than other environmental efforts.

Question

Answer

Con: I don't believe this, because saving the environment opens new safe paths, for example, building an adequate planet for both endangered and safe animals

Answer

Con: While saving species and their habitats is crucial, it should not overshadow other essential environmental efforts. Addressing broader issues like climate change, pollution, and sustainable resource management is equally important. These problems directly impact ecosystems and species survival on a global scale. By prioritizing a more holistic approach to environmental protection, we can create conditions where species conservation becomes more sustainable in the long run.

Answer

Con: Prioritizing species conservation can overlook pressing humanitarian and environmental issues. Millions of people face issues pollution, lack of clean water and poor sanitation.

Answer

Con: We have a duty to protect other living beings and their homes

Answer

Con: There are so many more problems revolving around enviormental issues such as light, noise and air pollution, etc... Therefore, we should do something about those things before we move on to saving wild life in order to create a safe enviroment for all life on Earth.

Answer

Con: in our opinion we shouldn`t lose so much time caring about animals and their habitats, because there is so many other problems more important than that. For example saving the environment, air pollution, climate change...

Answer

Pro: this balance helps provide us with essential resources like clean air and water.

Answer

Con: Some negatives it is destroy the environment.Also oxygen decreases in the environment .Additionally causes water pollution.

Answer

Con: The cons are that while we are trying and putting our efforts into saving the species we are noth thinging about other important enviromental things.

Answer

Pro: protecting species and their habitats ensures that ecosystems remain balanced and healthy.

Answer

Con: Saving the environment is surely more important than specifically saving species or their designated habitats

Answer

Con: Yeah but what about the threes, polution or other things we should worry about. Saving speacies wont do if we dont have the best inviroment for them.

Answer

Con: Focusing only on saving species and habitats might ignore broader issues like climate change or pollution, which are crucial for long-term survival. It risks neglecting the bigger picture of how ecosystems are interconnected. .

Answer

Pro: Elétric cars have very low maintenance costs as no oil, filter or cooling changes are necessary for the electric motor to operate. Which helps maintain personal income

Answer

Pro: Many industries such as agriculture , tourism and pharmaceuticals are directly dependet on ecosystem health and biodiversity

Answer

Pro: Conservation of biodiversity and natural habits offers valuable lessons about nature , science and the coexistence of organisms

Answer

Pro: Elétric-powered cars don't consume fossil fuels to operate and, therefore, don't produce direct carbon dioxide emissions. This way the car doesn't leave a trace of pollution during its operation nor does it emit smoke of any kind

Answer

Pro: saving different species and their habitats is as important as the other enviromental efforts but if we dont have good enviromental efforts its more difficult saving different species and their habitats

Team 1. Sustainable Solutions (S&S) - online workshop with students

Saving different species and their habitats should be more important than other environmental efforts.

Pros

Cons

protecting species and their habitats ensures that ecosystems remain balanced and healthy.

this balance helps provide us with essential resources like clean air and water.

Many industries such as agriculture , tourism and pharmaceuticals are directly dependet on ecosystem health and biodiversity

Elétric-powered cars don't consume fossil fuels to operate and, therefore, don't produce direct carbon dioxide emissions. This way the car doesn't leave a trace of pollution during its operation nor does it emit smoke of any kind

Elétric cars have very low maintenance costs as no oil, filter or cooling changes are necessary for the electric motor to operate. Which helps maintain personal income

Conservation of biodiversity and natural habits offers valuable lessons about nature , science and the coexistence of organisms

saving different species and their habitats is as important as the other enviromental efforts but if we dont have good enviromental efforts its more difficult saving different species and their habitats

There are so many more problems revolving around enviormental issues such as light, noise and air pollution, etc... Therefore, we should do something about those things before we move on to saving wild life in order to create a safe enviroment for all life on Earth.

We have a duty to protect other living beings and their homes

Prioritizing species conservation can overlook pressing humanitarian and environmental issues. Millions of people face issues pollution, lack of clean water and poor sanitation.

The cons are that while we are trying and putting our efforts into saving the species we are noth thinging about other important enviromental things.

Yeah but what about the threes, polution or other things we should worry about. Saving speacies wont do if we dont have the best inviroment for them.

Some negatives it is destroy the environment.Also oxygen decreases in the environment .Additionally causes water pollution.

Saving the environment is surely more important than specifically saving species or their designated habitats

Focusing only on saving species and habitats might ignore broader issues like climate change or pollution, which are crucial for long-term survival. It risks neglecting the bigger picture of how ecosystems are interconnected. .

in our opinion we shouldn`t lose so much time caring about animals and their habitats, because there is so many other problems more important than that. For example saving the environment, air pollution, climate change...

I don't believe this, because saving the environment opens new safe paths, for example, building an adequate planet for both endangered and safe animals

Selected thesis

Saving different species and their habitats should be more important than other environmental efforts.

Pro claim 1, children below

protecting species and their habitats ensures that ecosystems remain balanced and healthy.

Pro claim 2, children below

this balance helps provide us with essential resources like clean air and water.

Pro claim 3

Many industries such as agriculture , tourism and pharmaceuticals are directly dependet on ecosystem health and biodiversity

Pro claim 4, children below

Elétric-powered cars don't consume fossil fuels to operate and, therefore, don't produce direct carbon dioxide emissions. This way the car doesn't leave a trace of pollution during its operation nor does it emit smoke of any kind

Pro claim 5

Elétric cars have very low maintenance costs as no oil, filter or cooling changes are necessary for the electric motor to operate. Which helps maintain personal income

Pro claim 6

Conservation of biodiversity and natural habits offers valuable lessons about nature , science and the coexistence of organisms

Pro claim 7

saving different species and their habitats is as important as the other enviromental efforts but if we dont have good enviromental efforts its more difficult saving different species and their habitats

Con claim 1, children below

There are so many more problems revolving around enviormental issues such as light, noise and air pollution, etc... Therefore, we should do something about those things before we move on to saving wild life in order to create a safe enviroment for all life on Earth.

Con claim 2, children below

We have a duty to protect other living beings and their homes

Con claim 3

Prioritizing species conservation can overlook pressing humanitarian and environmental issues. Millions of people face issues pollution, lack of clean water and poor sanitation.

Con claim 4, children below

The cons are that while we are trying and putting our efforts into saving the species we are noth thinging about other important enviromental things.

Con claim 5

Yeah but what about the threes, polution or other things we should worry about. Saving speacies wont do if we dont have the best inviroment for them.

Con claim 6, children below

Some negatives it is destroy the environment.Also oxygen decreases in the environment .Additionally causes water pollution.

Con claim 7, children below

Saving the environment is surely more important than specifically saving species or their designated habitats

Con claim 8

Focusing only on saving species and habitats might ignore broader issues like climate change or pollution, which are crucial for long-term survival. It risks neglecting the bigger picture of how ecosystems are interconnected. .

Con claim 9

in our opinion we shouldn`t lose so much time caring about animals and their habitats, because there is so many other problems more important than that. For example saving the environment, air pollution, climate change...

Con claim 10

Con claim 11

I don't believe this, because saving the environment opens new safe paths, for example, building an adequate planet for both endangered and safe animals